IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ6/v3y2016i4p530-558.html

The Ranking of Researchers by Publications and Citations: Using RePEc Data

Author

Listed:
  • Kjell HAUSKEN

    (Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Stavanger, Norway)

Abstract

Researcher-level metrics assess a researcher’s publications and number of citations for each publication. This paper tests empirically 28 two-variable metrics, 26 of which are new in this paper, determined as geometric means from eight one-variable metrics. The 54 highest ranked researchers in RePEc are considered, 13 of whom are Nobel prize winners. One new one-variable metric, the number of citations for the 10th most cited publication, is introduced. Characteristics of the eight one-variable metrics are considered, illustrating why two-variable metrics are needed. The 54 researchers are ranked for all 36 metrics. The lowest sum of ranks for the 13 Nobel prize winners occurs for metric , the number of citations for the highest cited publication. The 13 Nobel prize winners have on average 5.3 higher rank on than on , suggesting a need for being widely cited, not captured by the -index. The metric , the square root of the product of the number of publications and the citation count, proposed as an interesting metric, correlates best with the RePEc scores. Correlations between the 36 metrics are determined. The 28 two-variable metrics are tentatively ranked according to how they capture characteristics apparently not captured by the one-variable metrics.

Suggested Citation

  • Kjell HAUSKEN, 2016. "The Ranking of Researchers by Publications and Citations: Using RePEc Data," Journal of Economics Bibliography, EconSciences Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 530-558, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:530-558
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/download/1085/1144
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEB/article/view/1085
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Nadia Simoes & Nuno Crespo, 2020. "A flexible approach for measuring author-level publishing performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 122(1), pages 331-355, January.
    3. Marlo M. Vernon & C. Makenzie Danley & Frances M. Yang, 2021. "Developing a measure of innovation from research in higher education data," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(5), pages 3919-3928, May.
    4. Laurent Linnemer, 2024. "A menagerie of rankings: a look in RePEc’s factory," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 129(1), pages 321-372, January.
    5. Mark Levene & Martyn Harris & Trevor Fenner, 2020. "A two-dimensional bibliometric index reflecting both quality and quantity," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 123(3), pages 1235-1246, June.
    6. Raphael Auer & Giulio Cornelli & Christian Zimmermann, 2025. "A Journal Ranking Based on Central Bank Citations," Review, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, vol. 107(9), pages 1-14, July.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • A12 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Relation of Economics to Other Disciplines
    • A14 - General Economics and Teaching - - General Economics - - - Sociology of Economics
    • C00 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - General - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ6:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:530-558. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEB .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.