IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ4/v3y2016i4p268-281.html

Resource Slack, Innovation Ambidexterity, and Quality Performance: Knowledge Heterogeneity Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Fu-Sheng TSAI

    (Cheng Shiu University, Department of Tourism & Recreation and Office of Institutional Research & Management, Taiwan.)

  • Che-Hung LIN

    (Cheng Shiu University, Department of Information Management, Taiwan.)

  • Kou-Cheng CHUNG

    (National Penghu University of Science and Technology, Department of Business Administration, Taiwan.)

Abstract

Resource slack and innovation ambidexterity can both be represented and connected conceptually with heterogeneous knowledge structure. Hypothesizing with the logic of knowledge heterogeneity, the present study empirically examined ambidexterity’s mediation effect in the relationship between two forms of resource slacks (i.e., human and financial resources) and product quality. Companies in Taiwanese manufacturing industry were located based on the random inspection conducted by the Department of Budget, Accounting and Statistics of the Government in 2011, and surveyed. Our findings demonstrated that slack resource is only an indirect factor for product quality evaluated by internal developers and producers (i.e. development and delivery processes) and external customers (product-specific quality). Specifically, first, different resource slacks influence differently on ambidexterity; second, both exploration and exploitation positively influence quality of innovation; third, ambidexterity plays a significant mediator’s role that may strategically alter the relationship between slack and quality. Research has paid increasing attention to ambidexterity (i.e., exploration and exploitation) in organizational innovation. Mostly, however, focus on the influencing factors leading to possible ambidextrous design or implementation of innovation. Few have examined ambidexterity’s effects on specific dimensions of innovation as outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Fu-Sheng TSAI & Che-Hung LIN & Kou-Cheng CHUNG, 2016. "Resource Slack, Innovation Ambidexterity, and Quality Performance: Knowledge Heterogeneity Perspective," Journal of Social and Administrative Sciences, EconSciences Journals, vol. 3(4), pages 268-281, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ4:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:268-281
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS/article/download/1068/1088
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS/article/view/1068
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • M10 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - General
    • M11 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Production Management
    • M14 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Business Administration - - - Corporate Culture; Diversity; Social Responsibility

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ4:v:3:y:2016:i:4:p:268-281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JSAS .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.