IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ3/v2y2015i2p76-91.html

A study product design of optimal solution for customer requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Shih-Chung LIAO

    (College of Planning and Design, TAIWAN.)

Abstract

In this paper, the author uses an evaluative criteria model and their associated criteria status, product evaluative criteria software of results and product objective function of optimal values solution, along with product morphological analysis, to synthesize evaluative criteria and optimize product design values. This study focuses on how to use an evaluative criteria model’s imprecise market information by evaluative criteria design software; product mapping relationships between design parameters and customer requirements using product predicted value method; synthesizing design alternative by morphological analysis and plan; realizing the synthesis in multi criterion decision making (MCDM), using its searching software capacity to obtain the optimal solution.

Suggested Citation

Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ3:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:76-91
as

Download full text from publisher

File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEST/article/download/274/429
Download Restriction: no
File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/JEST/article/view/274
Download Restriction: no
---><---

More about this item

Keywords

;
;
;
;
;

JEL classification:

  • F31 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Exchange
  • F47 - International Economics - - Macroeconomic Aspects of International Trade and Finance - - - Forecasting and Simulation: Models and Applications
  • L83 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Sports; Gambling; Restaurants; Recreation; Tourism
  • L88 - Industrial Organization - - Industry Studies: Services - - - Government Policy

Statistics

Access and download statistics

Corrections

All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ3:v:2:y:2015:i:2:p:76-91. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEST .

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.