IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ2/v4y2017i4p352-368.html

Did we find alternate to GDP to measure national progress? Analysis of Harvard University’s social progress index

Author

Listed:
  • Ahmad F. SIDDIQUI

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Ansar WASEEM

    (Department of Quantitative Methods, University of Management and Technology, Lahore, Pakistan.)

  • Dawood MAMOON

    (School of Business & Economics, University of Islamabad, Islamabad, Pakistan.)

Abstract

For major part of the preceding century, Economic Measures such as GDP, GNI etc were considered to measure economic as well as social and human progress of a country. However, scholars have raised concerns over the sufficiency of these economic measures. This propelled scholars to develop alternate measures for social improvement and human capability development. Consequently, indices such as Social Progress Imperative (SPI) and Human Development Index (HDI) were developed by renowned authors. However, little work is done to check effect of social progress on susceptibility against human trafficking and modern slavery, and business opportunities in the nation. Further, there is almost no empirical evidence which suggest that SPI is better scale than GDP or HDI in predicating different social measure. Therefore, data of 124 countries regarding SPI, HDI, GDP, Vulnerability to Enslavement, and Distance to Frontier score was collected for Year 2014. Secondary data analysis was performed and Simple Regression analysis was carried out on data for hypothesis testing. As proposed, a positive relationship of SPI and Ease of Doing Business was observed whereas negative relation was found between SPI and Vulnerability of Enslavement. In addition, SPI explain variation in both Vulnerability of Enslavement and Ease of Doing Business better than GDP and HDI, thereby providing evidence of its superior representation of social measures.

Suggested Citation

  • Ahmad F. SIDDIQUI & Ansar WASEEM & Dawood MAMOON, 2017. "Did we find alternate to GDP to measure national progress? Analysis of Harvard University’s social progress index," Turkish Economic Review, EconSciences Journals, vol. 4(4), pages 352-368, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ2:v:4:y:2017:i:4:p:352-368
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/download/1469/1476
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://econsciences.com/index.php/TER/article/view/1469
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O15 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Economic Development: Human Resources; Human Development; Income Distribution; Migration

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ2:v:4:y:2017:i:4:p:352-368. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/TER .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.