IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ1/v4y2017i2p192-202.html

Will Secular Stagnation be the Result of Great Recession

Author

Listed:
  • zg r ENMEZ

    (International Relations Department, Marmara University, Istanbul, Turkey.)

  • Levent DUMAN

    (Department of Political Science and Public Administration, Faculty of Political Sciences, Adana Science and Technology University, Adana, Turkey.)

Abstract

While Keynesian and neo-liberal discussions on the reasons of and solutions to the last financial crisis have persisted to the present day, new argument from Lawrence Summers and Paul Krugman in late 2013 shifted the debate to the issue of secular stagnation. Opposed to the neo-liberal haplessness regarding a parsimonious analysis of the events of recent years in global economy, Keynesians argued that falling private investment across the advanced economies was the most alarming development that can pave the way for secular stagnation. In this paper, after looking at the main tenets of the above mentioned discussion we will contest the explanations of both strands of political economy, at the same time we will suggest that critical Marxist arguments, especially on falling rate of profit, have been increasingly relevant to this discussion.

Suggested Citation

  • zg r ENMEZ & Levent DUMAN, 2017. "Will Secular Stagnation be the Result of Great Recession," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, EconSciences Journals, vol. 4(2), pages 192-202, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ1:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:192-202
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE/article/download/1300/1270
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: http://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE/article/view/1300
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • B00 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - General - - - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches
    • B24 - Schools of Economic Thought and Methodology - - History of Economic Thought since 1925 - - - Socialist; Marxist; Scraffian

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ1:v:4:y:2017:i:2:p:192-202. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.