IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvv/journ1/v10y2023i2p40-53.html

The competence of the national congress in Brazil to decide on policy domains marked by a high degree of technical complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Paula Gonçalves Ferreira SANTOS

    (Ph.D. Researcher of Swiss Management Center, Switzerland)

Abstract

The competence of the Legislative Power has legitimacy on several bases. The representativeness of Congresspeople, for what purpose they were elected. The competence of Congress concerning its legal system. The institution's technical capacity to understand and decide on the matter. Moreover, the relationship between the Legislative and Executive Powers. All these aspects are essential; however, no single answer works for all countries. Thus, what is investigated in this research is whether, in Brazil, the decision on matters of a technical nature is better taken by the Legislative Power. Or whether these decisions are best resolved within the Executive, where specialists in the field are located. The conclusion is that the Brazilian Parliament works in a unique way but allows a partnership between the Legislative and Executive branches to promote effective governance. Currently, this partnership requires the Executive to relinquish one of its inherent powers, as several technical issues are being addressed within the Legislative Branch. Notwithstanding, that is not the best way to undertake those concerns that demand expertise.

Suggested Citation

  • Paula Gonçalves Ferreira SANTOS, 2023. "The competence of the national congress in Brazil to decide on policy domains marked by a high degree of technical complexity," Journal of Economics and Political Economy, EconSciences Journals, vol. 10(2), pages 40-53, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvv:journ1:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:40-53
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE/article/view/2446/3194
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE/article/view/2446
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H77 - Public Economics - - State and Local Government; Intergovernmental Relations - - - Intergovernmental Relations; Federalism
    • K29 - Law and Economics - - Regulation and Business Law - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvv:journ1:v:10:y:2023:i:2:p:40-53. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Bilal KARGI (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.econsciences.com/index.php/JEPE .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.