IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/joulcs/v4y2025i2p40-50.html

From Social Slang to Standard Lexicon: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Mainstream Adoption of New Verbs in English

Author

Listed:
  • Miloslav T. Novotný

    (Masaryk University, Czech Republic)

  • Zdeněk R. Dvořáček

    (Masaryk University, Czech Republic)

Abstract

Language is a dynamic system that continuously evolves to reflect social, technological, and cultural changes. One of the most intriguing aspects of linguistic evolution is the transition of slang verbs into standard English, a process shaped by multiple factors, including digital media, cultural relevance, grammatical adaptability, and institutional validation. This study employs a corpus-based linguistic analysis to examine how verbs originating in informal speech and online discourse become widely accepted in mainstream language. Through a detailed analysis of selected case studies—including to Google, to binge-watch, to ghost, and to unfriend—this research explores the mechanisms by which new verbs gain traction, shift from niche to general usage, and ultimately achieve formal recognition in dictionaries and academic discourse. Findings indicate that digital communication platforms accelerate lexical diffusion, while words that describe emerging behaviors are more likely to endure and become embedded in everyday speech. The study also highlights the role of grammatical integration in determining the success of slang verbs, as well as the influence of institutional endorsement in legitimizing linguistic change. By mapping the trajectory of slang verbs from informal origins to standardized lexicon, this research contributes to the broader understanding of language evolution in the digital age and provides a framework for analyzing future trends in lexical innovation and standardization.

Suggested Citation

  • Miloslav T. Novotný & Zdeněk R. Dvořáček, 2025. "From Social Slang to Standard Lexicon: A Corpus-Based Analysis of the Mainstream Adoption of New Verbs in English," Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 4(2), pages 40-50, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:40-50
    DOI: 10.56397/JLCS.2025.04.04
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/JLCS/article/view/1275/1167
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JLCS.2025.04.04?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:4:y:2025:i:2:p:40-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.