IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/joulcs/v2y2023i1p1-9.html

Comparative Analysis of Chinese Proficiency Grading Vocabulary Between HSK2.0 and HSK3.0

Author

Listed:
  • Rong Li

    (School of International Education, Jianghan University, Wuhan 430056, Hubei)

Abstract

As the top-level design of international Chinese education at the HSK3.0 stage, Chinese Proficiency Grading Standards for International Chinese Language Education are improved in many aspects compared with International Curriculum for Chinese Language Education (Revised Edition) at the HSK2.0 stage. The requirements for vocabulary part of these two files are quite different in terms of total vocabulary quantity, difficulty, marking method and content. After comparative analysis, it is found that the new standard is more inclusive, practical and innovative in vocabulary part.

Suggested Citation

  • Rong Li, 2023. "Comparative Analysis of Chinese Proficiency Grading Vocabulary Between HSK2.0 and HSK3.0," Journal of Linguistics and Communication Studies, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 2(1), pages 1-9, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:1-9
    DOI: 10.56397/JLCS.2023.03.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/JLCS/article/view/118/95
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JLCS.2023.03.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:joulcs:v:2:y:2023:i:1:p:1-9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.