IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cvg/jouare/v4y2025i6p1-11.html

EFL Motivation of College Engineering Students in China in the Era of AI

Author

Listed:
  • Jing Hou

    (Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an, China)

  • Tao Tao

    (Huaiyin Institute of Technology, Huai’an, China)

Abstract

Based on Gardner’s theory of L2 motivation and Dörnyei’s L2 motivational self-system (L2 MSS model), this study, using the questionnaire survey method, investigates the English learning motivation of 76 freshmen majoring in engineering in China. The findings reveal that: (1) The English learning motivation of engineering students is dominated by instrumental motivation, with academic requirements (72.4%) and career development (68.4%) being the most prominent initial motivations; (2) Learning motivation shows a declining trend over time, with 63.2% of students reporting a decrease in enthusiasm, mainly attributed to the low relevance of course content to their major (average score 3.8/5) and the heavy workload of main courses (average score 4.1/5); (3) The use of AI tools shows the characteristic of “efficiency priority, efficacy in doubt”, with 58% of students using AI to complete English homework weekly, but 64.5% believing that it has limited effect on improving language proficiency; (4) Students have a strong demand for teaching reform, especially expecting material related to their major (efficacy score 4.3/5) and personalized feedback (efficacy score 4.38/5). The research indicates that in the AI era, the EFL learning motivation of engineering students presents a complex situation of “strengthened instrumental rationality and weakened intrinsic motivation”, which requires responses through curriculum integration, AI literacy cultivation, and the reconstruction of teacher-student relationships.

Suggested Citation

  • Jing Hou & Tao Tao, 2025. "EFL Motivation of College Engineering Students in China in the Era of AI," Journal of Advanced Research in Education, Pioneer Academic Publishing Limited, vol. 4(6), pages 1-11, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:cvg:jouare:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:1-11
    DOI: 10.56397/JARE.2025.11.01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/jare/article/view/1505/1417
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.56397/JARE.2025.11.01?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cvg:jouare:v:4:y:2025:i:6:p:1-11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Editorial Office (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.pioneerpublisher.com/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.