IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/wotrrv/v9y2010i03p487-504_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Alliances, market power, and postwar trade: explaining the GATT/WTO

Author

Listed:
  • GOWA, JOANNE

Abstract

This paper argues that testing the empirical implications of existing theories about institutions yields rich insights into the postwar trade regime. Market-failure theory predicts that the GATT/WTO will exert its strongest impact on trade between its largest member states. A theory based on security externalities implies that a sizeable expansion of trade will also occur between a subset of the contracting parties that alliance ties link. An analysis of the data shows that the evidence is consistent with both theories, making clear the value added of taking explicitly into account the economics and politics that motivated the establishment of the postwar regime and that governed its subsequent operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gowa, Joanne, 2010. "Alliances, market power, and postwar trade: explaining the GATT/WTO," World Trade Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(3), pages 487-504, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:9:y:2010:i:03:p:487-504_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1474745610000273/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing Li & Hongkui Liu & Qian Xie, 2023. "Bilateral Relations and Exports: Evidence from Google Big Data," China & World Economy, Institute of World Economics and Politics, Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, vol. 31(1), pages 182-210, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:wotrrv:v:9:y:2010:i:03:p:487-504_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/wtr .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.