IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v8y2020i2p285-300_6.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations

Author

Listed:
  • Falcó-Gimeno, Albert
  • Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo

Abstract

This paper examines how a party’s decision to enter a coalition government affects voter perceptions of the party’s policy position. We argue that, for the decision to change voter beliefs, it must be at odds with voters’ prior opinions about the party. Specifically, the party must join a coalition that is not the one voters perceive as the ideologically closest option. Otherwise, the party’s action simply confirms voters’ pre-existing beliefs. Hence, whether or not joining a coalition alters voter attitudes depends on the type of alternative coalitions the party could enter. We test the hypothesis using three complementary empirical strategies: a cross-country analysis of party reputations in five coalition-prone European countries, individual panel data, and a quasi-experimental test. All three empirical tests provide support for our claim. This paper contributes to our understanding of voter information processing, coalition politics, and party competition.

Suggested Citation

  • Falcó-Gimeno, Albert & Fernandez-Vazquez, Pablo, 2020. "Choices that matter: Coalition formation and parties’ ideological reputations," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(2), pages 285-300, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:285-300_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847018000638/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:8:y:2020:i:2:p:285-300_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.