IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v7y2019i01p185-196_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Measuring Knowledge of Parties’ Legislative Seat Shares

Author

Listed:
  • Lee, Seonghui
  • Haime, Agustina
  • Stevenson, Randolph

Abstract

We use two original surveys (including survey experiments) conducted the week before the 2015 elections in the Britain and Denmark to explore the best method for measuring individuals’ knowledge of the partisan distribution of legislative seats in multi-party democracies. The complete lack of such questions in the corpus of survey research on multi-party democracies is a testament to the skepticism that many survey researchers have about the feasibility of such complex questions. However, our analysis, which is the first empirical test of this skepticism, reveals little evidence of respondents’ frustration or high levels of non-cooperation with these questions. Additionally, our survey experiments, which examine the usefulness of different question formats, make it clear that such questions should be framed in terms of the numbers of seats each party holds rather than shares or percentages of seats.

Suggested Citation

  • Lee, Seonghui & Haime, Agustina & Stevenson, Randolph, 2019. "Measuring Knowledge of Parties’ Legislative Seat Shares," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(1), pages 185-196, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:7:y:2019:i:01:p:185-196_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847017000310/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:7:y:2019:i:01:p:185-196_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.