IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v5y2017i03p529-554_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Bräuninger, Thomas
  • Debus, Marc
  • Wüst, Fabian

Abstract

Various strands of literature in comparative politics suggest that there is a differential impact of the type of government and their supporting legislative coalitions in parliamentary democracies, for example, in terms of their size and ideological heterogeneity, and on their potential to induce policy change. Most studies in this area focus on governments as agenda-setters, possibly neglecting the role of parliaments as a further key actor in policy making. In this article, we address the broader question as to how patterns of conflict within parliament effect legislative activity of governments and parliamentary actors. Through a simultaneous analysis of the success and event history of over 12,000 legislative bills in three parliamentary systems and one semi-presidential system from 1986 until 2003, we show how the interplay of actor motivations and institutional settings has a discriminating impact on the potential of both the government and parliament to induce policy change.

Suggested Citation

  • Bräuninger, Thomas & Debus, Marc & Wüst, Fabian, 2017. "Governments, Parliaments and Legislative Activity," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 529-554, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:5:y:2017:i:03:p:529-554_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847015000291/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Morelli, Massimo & Osnabrügge, Moritz & Vannoni, Matia, 2020. "Legislative Activity and Private Benefits: A Natural Experiment in New Zealand," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(3), pages 565-570, July.
    2. Osnat Akirav, 2021. "The Frequency of Use of Legislative and Non-Legislative Tools in Five Countries," Review of European Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 13(3), pages 1-14, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:5:y:2017:i:03:p:529-554_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.