IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v5y2017i03p511-527_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Diffusion in Congress: Measuring the Social Dynamics of Legislative Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Lindstädt, René
  • Vander Wielen, Ryan J.
  • Green, Matthew

Abstract

While there is a substantial literature highlighting the presence of social dynamics in legislatures, we know very little about the precise processes that generate these social dynamics. Yet, whether social dynamics are due to peer pressure, frequency of interaction, or genuine learning, for example, has important implications for questions of political representation and accountability. We demonstrate how a recent innovation can be used to study the diffusion of behavior within legislatures. In particular, we study diffusion within the US House of Representatives by looking at the dynamic process underlying discharge petitions. The discharge procedure shares many characteristics with other forms of legislative behavior, yet it has one important advantage when it comes to studying social dynamics: we can observe when members decide to sign petitions. Based on data from 1995 to 2014, we find that the social dynamics underlying the discharge procedure tend to involve the rational evaluation of information conveyed by the behavior of previous petition signatories.

Suggested Citation

  • Lindstädt, René & Vander Wielen, Ryan J. & Green, Matthew, 2017. "Diffusion in Congress: Measuring the Social Dynamics of Legislative Behavior," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 5(3), pages 511-527, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:5:y:2017:i:03:p:511-527_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S204984701600042X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:5:y:2017:i:03:p:511-527_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.