IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v1y2013i01p117-137_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Voting Made Safe and Easy: The Impact of e-voting on Citizen Perceptions

Author

Listed:
  • Alvarez, R. Michael
  • Levin, Ines
  • Pomares, Julia
  • Leiras, Marcelo

Abstract

Voting technologies frame the voting experience. Different ways of presenting information to voters, registering voter choices and counting ballots may change the voting experience and cause individuals to re-evaluate the legitimacy of the electoral process. Yet few field experiments have evaluated how voting technologies affect the voting experience. This article uses unique data from a recent e-voting field experiment in Salta, Argentina to study these questions. It employs propensity-score matching methods to measure the causal effect of replacing traditional voting technology with e-voting on the voting experience. The study's main finding is that while e-voters perceive the new technology as easier to use and more likely to register votes as intended—and support replacing traditional voting technologies with e-voting—the new technologies also raise some concerns about ballot secrecy.

Suggested Citation

  • Alvarez, R. Michael & Levin, Ines & Pomares, Julia & Leiras, Marcelo, 2013. "Voting Made Safe and Easy: The Impact of e-voting on Citizen Perceptions," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 1(1), pages 117-137, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:1:y:2013:i:01:p:117-137_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847013000022/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:1:y:2013:i:01:p:117-137_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.