IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v14y2026i2p430-450_10.html

Reassessing World Bank conditionality: beyond count measures

Author

Listed:
  • Winter, Jacob
  • Cormier, Ben
  • Kramarz, Teresa
  • Manger, Mark S.

Abstract

Many studies argue that the World Bank grants favorable loan conditions to allies of its powerful principals. These studies typically use the count of conditions as a proxy for how demanding loans are on borrowers, even though some conditions are more difficult to comply with than others. We propose a new operationalization: a measure of conditionality stringency in Bank loans constructed using Latent Semantic Scaling. Using this new measure, we find little evidence of a generalizable influence of powerful principals. Instead, the stringency of loan conditions is associated with bureaucratic assessments of risk. To facilitate future research, we provide a new dataset of World Bank loan condition texts and our measure of text stringency for all loans in the dataset.

Suggested Citation

  • Winter, Jacob & Cormier, Ben & Kramarz, Teresa & Manger, Mark S., 2026. "Reassessing World Bank conditionality: beyond count measures," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(2), pages 430-450, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:430-450_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847025000196/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:14:y:2026:i:2:p:430-450_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.