IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v14y2026i1p168-176_11.html

Reward or punishment? The distribution of life-cycle returns to political office

Author

Listed:
  • Dahlgaard, Jens Olav
  • Kjøller, Frederik K.
  • Kristensen, Nicolai

Abstract

The remuneration of MPs affects who engages in politics. Even if average returns to office are positive, as found in all other studies, some officeholders’ returns are likely negative. Further, the timing of returns to office is crucial as politicians often enjoy delayed compensation like lucrative pensions. Utilizing administrative data for parliamentary candidates in Denmark from 1994 to 2015, we estimate first-time runners’ earnings and total income returns to office. Based on total income, practically all elected MPs experience economic gains during their first term. Computations of life-cycle returns reveal that the 25 percent highest earning candidates (pre-office) have no long-term economic gain from winning. Generally, considering the distribution and timing of returns to office improves studies of how office-holding is economically rewarded.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahlgaard, Jens Olav & Kjøller, Frederik K. & Kristensen, Nicolai, 2026. "Reward or punishment? The distribution of life-cycle returns to political office," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 168-176, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:14:y:2026:i:1:p:168-176_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847024000670/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:14:y:2026:i:1:p:168-176_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.