IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v13y2025i4p962-978_11.html

Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans

Author

Listed:
  • Pérez, Efrén
  • Goldman, Seth K.
  • Huo, Yuen J.
  • Nteta, Tatishe
  • Tropp, Linda R.

Abstract

Mounting U.S. research suggests many non-White individuals feel solidarity with, and identify as, people of color (PoC). Yet measurement limitations prevent scholars from testing whether these constructs are empirically different. We explain why these concepts diverge and evaluate our claims with an expanded battery of measures across U.S. Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial adults (N = 3402). Using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis, we show these items capture related but distinct concepts among PoC (configural invariance). We then establish that these items uniformly measure each construct across PoC groups (metric invariance), with mean level differences validly reflecting actual heterogeneity between groups, rather than measurement artifacts (scalar invariance). Finally, consistent with our conceptualization, we show that solidarity among PoC mediates the association between PoC identification and support for policies that implicate various communities of color. We end with practical advice for using these items in surveys of racially diverse populations.

Suggested Citation

  • Pérez, Efrén & Goldman, Seth K. & Huo, Yuen J. & Nteta, Tatishe & Tropp, Linda R., 2025. "Are solidarity and identification as people of color distinct? Validating new measures across Asian, Black, Latino, and Multiracial Americans," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(4), pages 962-978, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:962-978_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S204984702400061X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:4:p:962-978_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.