IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v13y2025i3p663-679_9.html

Estimating public opinion from surveys: the impact of including a “don't know” response option in policy preference questions

Author

Listed:
  • Elkjær, Mads Andreas
  • Wlezien, Christopher

Abstract

What are the consequences of including a “don't know” (DK) response option to attitudinal survey questions? Existing research, based on traditional survey modes, argues that it reduces the effective sample size without improving the quality of responses. We contend that it can have important effects not only on estimates of aggregate public opinion, but also on estimates of opinion differences between subgroups of the population who have different levels of political information. Through a pre-registered online survey experiment conducted in the United States, we find that the DK response option has consequences for opinion estimates in the present day, where most organizations rely on online panels, but mainly for respondents with low levels of political information and on low salience issues. These findings imply that the exclusion of a DK option can matter, with implications for assessments of preference differences and our understanding of their impacts on politics and policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Elkjær, Mads Andreas & Wlezien, Christopher, 2025. "Estimating public opinion from surveys: the impact of including a “don't know” response option in policy preference questions," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 663-679, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:663-679_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847024000426/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:663-679_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.