IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v13y2025i3p567-590_4.html

Inclusive meritocracy: ability and descriptive representation among Danish politicians

Author

Listed:
  • Dahlgaard, Jens Olav
  • Pedersen, Rasmus T.

Abstract

Can democracies attract and elect politicians who are both high-ability and from diverse backgrounds? Using data covering the entire Danish population, including every candidate for local and national elections in 1990–2015, we explore the selection of political candidates. We show that Danish candidates and elected politicians have higher ability than the voters they represent, that selection on ability reflects individual skills rather than social background, that politicians are selected from economically diverse backgrounds, and that there is no substantial trade-off between ability and representation. Furthermore, we utilize a major structural reform, which significantly reduced the number of municipalities in Denmark, to show that increased political competition did not affect politicians’ ability, economic background, or the trade-off between the two.

Suggested Citation

  • Dahlgaard, Jens Olav & Pedersen, Rasmus T., 2025. "Inclusive meritocracy: ability and descriptive representation among Danish politicians," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(3), pages 567-590, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:567-590_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847024000128/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:3:p:567-590_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.