IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/pscirm/v13y2025i1p203-211_13.html

How to improve the substantive interpretation of regression results when the dependent variable is logged

Author

Listed:
  • Rittmann, Oliver
  • Neunhoeffer, Marcel
  • Gschwend, Thomas

Abstract

Regression models with log-transformed dependent variables are widely used by social scientists to investigate nonlinear relationships between variables. Unfortunately, this transformation complicates the substantive interpretation of estimation results and often leads to incomplete and sometimes even misleading interpretations. We focus on one valuable but underused method, the presentation of quantities of interest such as expected values or first differences on the original scale of the dependent variable. The procedure to derive these quantities differs in seemingly minor but critical aspects from the well-known procedure based on standard linear models. To improve empirical practice, we explain the underlying problem and develop guidelines that help researchers to derive meaningful interpretations from regression results of models with log-transformed dependent variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Rittmann, Oliver & Neunhoeffer, Marcel & Gschwend, Thomas, 2025. "How to improve the substantive interpretation of regression results when the dependent variable is logged," Political Science Research and Methods, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13(1), pages 203-211, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:203-211_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2049847023000298/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:pscirm:v:13:y:2025:i:1:p:203-211_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/ram .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.