IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v24y2016i1p104-120_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Enhancing Sensitivity Diagnostics for Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Combinatorial Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Thiem, Alrik
  • Spöhel, Reto
  • DuÅŸa, Adrian

Abstract

Sensitivity diagnostics has recently been put high on the agenda of methodological research into Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Existing studies in this area rely on the technique of exhaustive enumeration, and the majority of works examine the reactivity of QCA either only to alterations in discretionary parameter values or only to data quality. In this article, we introduce the technique of combinatorial computation for evaluating the interaction effects between two problems afflicting data quality and two discretionary parameters on the stability of QCA reference solutions. In this connection, we challenge a hitherto unstated assumption intrinsic to exhaustive enumeration, show that combinatorial computation permits the formulation of general laws of sensitivity in QCA, and demonstrate that our technique is most efficient.

Suggested Citation

  • Thiem, Alrik & Spöhel, Reto & DuÅŸa, Adrian, 2016. "Enhancing Sensitivity Diagnostics for Qualitative Comparative Analysis: A Combinatorial Approach," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(1), pages 104-120, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:24:y:2016:i:1:p:104-120_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700012067/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:24:y:2016:i:1:p:104-120_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.