IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/polals/v24y2016i03p339-355_01.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models

Author

Listed:
  • Rainey, Carlisle

Abstract

When facing small numbers of observations or rare events, political scientists often encounter separation, in which explanatory variables perfectly predict binary events or nonevents. In this situation, maximum likelihood provides implausible estimates and the researcher might want incorporate some form of prior information into the model. The most sophisticated research uses Jeffreys’ invariant prior to stabilize the estimates. While Jeffreys’ prior has the advantage of being automatic, I show that it often provides too much prior information, producing smaller point estimates and narrower confidence intervals than even highly skeptical priors. To help researchers assess the amount of information injected by the prior distribution, I introduce the concept of a partial prior distribution and develop the tools required to compute the partial prior distribution of quantities of interest, estimate the subsequent model, and summarize the results.

Suggested Citation

  • Rainey, Carlisle, 2016. "Dealing with Separation in Logistic Regression Models," Political Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(3), pages 339-355, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:24:y:2016:i:03:p:339-355_01
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1047198700014078/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Frederico Machado Almeida & Enrico Antônio Colosimo & Vinícius Diniz Mayrink, 2021. "Firth adjusted score function for monotone likelihood in the mixture cure fraction model," Lifetime Data Analysis: An International Journal Devoted to Statistical Methods and Applications for Time-to-Event Data, Springer, vol. 27(1), pages 131-155, January.
    2. Boonstra, Philip S. & Barbaro, Ryan P. & Sen, Ananda, 2019. "Default priors for the intercept parameter in logistic regressions," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 245-256.
    3. Ghinami, Francesca & Montresor, Sandro, 2023. "Tangible and intangible proximities in the access to Venture Capital: evidence from Italian innovative start-ups," SocArXiv hqrj7, Center for Open Science.
    4. Frederico M. Almeida & Vinícius D. Mayrink & Enrico A. Colosimo, 2023. "Bayesian solution to the monotone likelihood in the standard mixture cure model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 77(3), pages 365-390, August.
    5. Beiser-McGrath, Liam F., 2020. "Separation and rare events," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 117222, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    6. Matthew Reimherr & Xiao‐Li Meng & Dan L. Nicolae, 2021. "Prior sample size extensions for assessing prior impact and prior‐likelihood discordance," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(3), pages 413-437, July.
    7. Mani Suleiman & Haydar Demirhan & Leanne Boyd & Federico Girosi & Vural Aksakalli, 2019. "Bayesian logistic regression approaches to predict incorrect DRG assignment," Health Care Management Science, Springer, vol. 22(2), pages 364-375, June.
    8. Ryan M. Welch, 2019. "Domestic politics and the power to punish: The case of national human rights institutions," Conflict Management and Peace Science, Peace Science Society (International), vol. 36(4), pages 385-404, July.
    9. Rahmouni, Mohieddine, 2023. "Corruption and corporate innovation in Tunisia during an economic downturn," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 314-326.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:polals:v:24:y:2016:i:03:p:339-355_01. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/pan .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.