IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v8y2020i1p79-96_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same- and cross-gender bullies and same- and cross-gender victims

Author

Listed:
  • Hooijsma, Marianne
  • Huitsing, Gijs
  • Kisfalusi, Dorottya
  • Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis
  • Flache, Andreas
  • Veenstra, René

Abstract

Similar peers are more likely to become friends, but it remains unclear how the combination of multiple characteristics, known as multidimensional similarity, influences friendships. This study aimed to investigate whether similarity in gender (attribute) and bullying or victimization (network position) contributes to friendships. The school-level networks of friendships and victim-bully relationships in 17 Dutch elementary schools (2,130 students) were examined using multiplex longitudinal social network models (RSiena). The results showed that friendships were more likely to occur between same-gender peers and between bullies sharing their targets of victimization. Multidimensional similarity (similarities in gender as well as bullying) increased the likelihood of friendships for same-gender bullies targeting the same victims, but not for same-gender victims sharing bullies. The findings underline the importance of unraveling the interplay between different dimensions of similarity for children’s relationships and surpass unidimensional similarity based on single attributes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hooijsma, Marianne & Huitsing, Gijs & Kisfalusi, Dorottya & Dijkstra, Jan Kornelis & Flache, Andreas & Veenstra, René, 2020. "Multidimensional similarity in multiplex networks: friendships between same- and cross-gender bullies and same- and cross-gender victims," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 8(1), pages 79-96, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:79-96_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124220000016/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:8:y:2020:i:1:p:79-96_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.