IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v7y2019i02p196-214_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A paradigm for longitudinal complex network analysis over patient cohorts in neuroscience

Author

Listed:
  • Shappell, Heather
  • Tripodis, Yorghos
  • Killiany, Ronald J.
  • Kolaczyk, Eric D.

Abstract

The study of complex brain networks, where structural or functional connections are evaluated to create an interconnected representation of the brain, has grown tremendously over the past decade. Many of the statistical network science tools for analyzing brain networks have been developed for cross-sectional studies and for the analysis of static networks. However, with both an increase in longitudinal study designs and an increased interest in the neurological network changes that occur during the progression of a disease, sophisticated methods for longitudinal brain network analysis are needed. We propose a paradigm for longitudinal brain network analysis over patient cohorts, with the key challenge being the adaptation of Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models to the neuroscience setting. Stochastic Actor-Oriented Models are designed to capture network dynamics representing a variety of influences on network change in a continuous-time Markov chain framework. Network dynamics are characterized through both endogenous (i.e. network related) and exogenous effects, where the latter include mechanisms conjectured in the literature. We outline an application to the resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging setting with data from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative study. We draw illustrative conclusions at the subject level and make a comparison between elderly controls and individuals with Alzheimer’s disease.

Suggested Citation

  • Shappell, Heather & Tripodis, Yorghos & Killiany, Ronald J. & Kolaczyk, Eric D., 2019. "A paradigm for longitudinal complex network analysis over patient cohorts in neuroscience," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(2), pages 196-214, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:7:y:2019:i:02:p:196-214_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124219000092/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:7:y:2019:i:02:p:196-214_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.