IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v3y2015i04p445-479_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Relative centrality and local community detection

Author

Listed:
  • CHANG, CHENG-SHANG
  • CHANG, CHIH-JUNG
  • HSIEH, WEN-TING
  • LEE, DUAN-SHIN
  • LIOU, LI-HENG
  • LIAO, WANJIUN

Abstract

In this paper, we develop a formal framework for what a good community should look like and how strong a community is (community strength). One of the key innovations is to incorporate the concept of relative centrality into structural analysis of networks. In our framework, relative centrality is a measure that measures how important a set of nodes in a network is with respect to another set of nodes, and it is a generalization of centrality. Building on top of relative centrality, the community strength for a set of nodes is measured by the difference between its relative centrality with respect to itself and its centrality. A community is then a set of nodes with a nonnegative community strength. We show that our community strength is related to conductance that is commonly used for measuring the strength of a small community. We define the modularity for a partition of a network as the average community strength for a randomly selected node. Such a definition generalizes the original Newman's modularity and recovers the stability in as special cases. For the local community detection problem, we also develop efficient agglomerative algorithms that guarantee the community strength of the detected local community.

Suggested Citation

  • Chang, Cheng-Shang & Chang, Chih-Jung & Hsieh, Wen-Ting & Lee, Duan-Shin & Liou, Li-Heng & Liao, Wanjiun, 2015. "Relative centrality and local community detection," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 3(4), pages 445-479, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:3:y:2015:i:04:p:445-479_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124215000235/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:3:y:2015:i:04:p:445-479_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.