IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v14y2026ipe32_32.html

Comparing US childfree adults’ and parents’ networks of close relationships: Size and composition

Author

Listed:
  • Neal, Jennifer Watling
  • Neal, Zachary

Abstract

Childfree adults do not have or want children. Although they often experience social stigma and are subject to negative stereotypes, few studies have directly examined childfree adults’ social networks. In this study, we examine whether childfree adults’ networks of close relationships differ in size and composition from those of parents. Using representative egocentric network data in the United States from the CHIP50-NET survey, we tested three pre-registered hypotheses regarding the size and composition of 2,928 childfree adults’ and 12,863 parents’ networks. Compared to parents, childfree adults had significantly smaller networks, especially in middle age. Additionally, on average, a minority (44%) of childfree adults’ close relationships were with parents, while a majority (62%) of parents’ close relationships were with other parents. The differences between childfree adults and parents in network size and composition are modest, but call for further research on this gap’s implications for childfree adults’ well-being and risk of lower social support.

Suggested Citation

  • Neal, Jennifer Watling & Neal, Zachary, 2026. "Comparing US childfree adults’ and parents’ networks of close relationships: Size and composition," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14, pages 1-32, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:e32_32
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124226100563/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:e32_32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.