IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v14y2026ip-_17.html

Recommendations for conducting ethical network research

Author

Listed:
  • Ortiz Ruiz, Francisca
  • Tubaro, Paola
  • Molina, José Luis
  • Neal, Jennifer Watling
  • Vacca, Raffaele
  • Diesner, Jana
  • adams, jimi
  • Birkett, Michelle
  • Godley, Jenny
  • Lovato, Juniper
  • Schönhuth, Michael
  • Teves, Laura
  • Zimmer, Michael

Abstract

Ethical considerations in social network studies are grounded in the general principles of human subjects’ research, including avoidance of harm, promotion of justice, equitable distribution of burdens and benefits, respect for human dignity, and protection of confidentiality. To help navigate these challenges, this article presents recommendations for conducting ethical network research, developed by a multi-disciplinary and multi-national working group. The article is divided in three main sections where there are certain recommendations identified for each one of them: data collections, use, and availability. Discovering how others addressed and solved problems can be a way for all of us to improve our capacity to stand up to the scrutiny of ethical governance bodies, while also increasing our capacity to responsibly address novel, rare, or otherwise difficult situations for which institutions provide limited guidance. We see this as a first step toward a virtuous circle, or a form of “generalized indirect reciprocity” whereby researchers share information that may be relevant for others, and benefit at the same time from the information given by other members of the social networks analysis community. Our goal is to continue to produce and promote scientifically solid, ethical social network research.

Suggested Citation

  • Ortiz Ruiz, Francisca & Tubaro, Paola & Molina, José Luis & Neal, Jennifer Watling & Vacca, Raffaele & Diesner, Jana & adams, jimi & Birkett, Michelle & Godley, Jenny & Lovato, Juniper & Schönhuth, Mi, 2026. "Recommendations for conducting ethical network research," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:-_17
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124226100344/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:-_17. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.