IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v14y2026ip-_10.html

Enhancing joint ideal point estimation strategies with Twitter social networks and text data

Author

Listed:
  • Shen, Yicheng
  • Bail, Christopher
  • Volfovsky, Alexander

Abstract

Analyses of online social interactions on major platforms have become central to evaluating the ideological leanings of users. Social scientists often represent individuals’ policy preferences as ideal points in a low-dimensional space. We first demonstrate that standard ideal-point estimation approaches can be temporally inconsistent by examining the evolution of ideological positions for political elites and non-elite Twitter users from 2017 to 2022. To address this instability and to improve overall measurement quality, we augment the social-network data conventionally used for ideal-point estimation with unstructured text data widely available on social media. Our results indicate that this data-augmented approach improves identification at the extreme ends of the ideological spectrum and yields robust estimates consistent with those from more complex word-embedding techniques, while offering greater computational efficiency and interpretability. This framework can enhance future studies that measure political ideology using behavioral data and inform broader discussions about integrating textual and network information.

Suggested Citation

  • Shen, Yicheng & Bail, Christopher & Volfovsky, Alexander, 2026. "Enhancing joint ideal point estimation strategies with Twitter social networks and text data," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:-_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124226100289/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:14:y:2026:i::p:-_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.