IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/netsci/v13y2025ip-_11.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spectral goodness-of-fit tests for complete and partial network data

Author

Listed:
  • Lubold, Shane
  • Liu, Bolun
  • McCormick, Tyler

Abstract

Networks describe complex relationships between individual actors. In this work, we address the question of how to determine whether a parametric model, such as a stochastic block model or latent space model, fits a data set well, and will extrapolate to similar data. We use recent results in random matrix theory to derive a general goodness-of-fit (GoF) test for dyadic data. We show that our method, when applied to a specific model of interest, provides a straightforward, computationally fast way of selecting parameters in a number of commonly used network models. For example, we show how to select the dimension of the latent space in latent space models. Unlike other network GoF methods, our general approach does not require simulating from a candidate parametric model, which can be cumbersome with large graphs, and eliminates the need to choose a particular set of statistics on the graph for comparison. It also allows us to perform GoF tests on partial network data, such as Aggregated Relational Data. We show with simulations that our method performs well in many situations of interest. We analyze several empirically relevant networks and show that our method leads to improved community detection algorithms.

Suggested Citation

  • Lubold, Shane & Liu, Bolun & McCormick, Tyler, 2025. "Spectral goodness-of-fit tests for complete and partial network data," Network Science, Cambridge University Press, vol. 13, pages 1-1, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:13:y:2025:i::p:-_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S2050124225100052/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:netsci:v:13:y:2025:i::p:-_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/nws .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.