IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v7y2011i03p423-432_00.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Author Ethical Dilemmas in the Research Publication Process

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Xiao-Ping

Abstract

While editors and their editorial teams play an important role in gatekeeping the knowledge dissemination process, the majority of the responsibility to ensure the quality of the created knowledge and its fair review actually falls on the shoulder of the authors. This essay discusses the dilemmas faced by authors between maximizing their publication possibilities and being truthful to data, to co-authors, and to editors. Potential solutions are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Xiao-Ping, 2011. "Author Ethical Dilemmas in the Research Publication Process," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 7(3), pages 423-432, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:7:y:2011:i:03:p:423-432_00
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877600002588/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Malen Hollmann & Carme Borrell & Olatz Garin & Esteve Fernández & Jordi Alonso, 2015. "Factors influencing publication of scientific articles derived from masters theses in public health," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 60(4), pages 495-504, May.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:7:y:2011:i:03:p:423-432_00. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.