IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v22y2026i3p654-679_8.html

Targeting Citizen Experience: A Meta-analysis on the Relationship Between E-government Resources and E-participation Intention

Author

Listed:
  • Peng, Lifang
  • Wang, Suli
  • Jiang, Hui
  • Wang, Kaichao
  • Li, Gang
  • Peng, Yubo

Abstract

To advance the understanding of how e-government resources drive e-participation, the current research conducts a meta-analysis on the relationship above from the perspective of citizen experience. This meta-analysis synthesizes 517 effect sizes from 126 empirical studies to examine how e-government resources influence citizens’ e-participation intention. The findings highlight several key variables that moderate this effect. Specifically: (1) From the perspective of the experience channel, e-government resources are more effective in facilitating citizen e-participation intention when delivered through social (vs. official) channels. (2) From the perspective of the experience affair, e-government resources exert a stronger impact on citizen e-participation intention when targeting specific (vs. general) public affairs and when focusing on regional (vs. national) government affairs. (3) From the perspective of the experience environment, the effect of e-government resources on e-participation intention is stronger in developing (vs. developed) countries. Based on these findings, this study offers implications for governments and researchers and suggests directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Peng, Lifang & Wang, Suli & Jiang, Hui & Wang, Kaichao & Li, Gang & Peng, Yubo, 2026. "Targeting Citizen Experience: A Meta-analysis on the Relationship Between E-government Resources and E-participation Intention," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(3), pages 654-679, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:22:y:2026:i:3:p:654-679_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877625101083/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:22:y:2026:i:3:p:654-679_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.