IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v22y2026i1p98-122_5.html

Mutual Monitoring: How TMT Faultlines Affect Corporate Fraud

Author

Listed:
  • Teng, Da
  • Li, Mengge
  • Chen, Shuai
  • Ai, Qi

Abstract

We develop and test a theoretical model to investigate the effects of faultlines within the top management team (TMT) on corporate financial fraud. We propose that TMT faultlines can generate mutual monitoring among factional subgroups in the executive suite, which reduces fraudulent behavior. We also examine the contingent roles of subgroup configuration and the TMT members’ tenure overlap in shaping the relationship between TMT faultlines and financial fraud. The mutual monitoring effect is likely to be stronger when the TMT has a balanced subgroup configuration and shorter TMT members’ tenure overlap. We test our argument in the context of publicly listed firms in China. This article extends the mutual monitoring perspective of corporate governance and has important research implications for the corporate financial fraud literature.

Suggested Citation

  • Teng, Da & Li, Mengge & Chen, Shuai & Ai, Qi, 2026. "Mutual Monitoring: How TMT Faultlines Affect Corporate Fraud," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 22(1), pages 98-122, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:98-122_5
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877625100843/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:22:y:2026:i:1:p:98-122_5. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.