IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v21y2025i5p974-1020_8.html

Can a Penalty for Environmental Violations Promote Corporate Environmental Governance? An Analysis of the Deterrence Effect from the Perspective of Peer Influence

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Shan
  • Xie, Wei

Abstract

Previous studies have primarily advocated enhancing the deterrent effects of sanctions against offending firms to prevent organizational environmental violations. However, despite stricter regulatory environments, violations that cross the ‘red line’ remain pervasive. Limited research has delved into the factors that influence an organization’s ability to learn from environmental sanctions imposed on others. To address this gap, inspired by social learning theory, we examine whether environmental sanctions imposed on violating firms deter environmental governance among their industry and regional peers using a sample of Chinese-listed firms from 2008 to 2021. Our findings indicate that increasing the frequency and severity of penalties for offending firms – particularly those leading firms and state-owned-enterprises or those with close ties – can affect the environmental governance practices of their peers, both in terms of process and outcome, underscoring the critical role of peer influence in enforcing environmental regulations. Additionally, the current article also concludes that the general deterrence effect on peers is more pronounced in competitive industries and regions with underdeveloped legal frameworks.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Shan & Xie, Wei, 2025. "Can a Penalty for Environmental Violations Promote Corporate Environmental Governance? An Analysis of the Deterrence Effect from the Perspective of Peer Influence," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 974-1020, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:974-1020_8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877625100739/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:974-1020_8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.