IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v21y2025i5p915-942_6.html

Superstition and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese Zodiac Year Belief

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Lin
  • Zhang, Guo
  • Zeng, Chenlv
  • Chen, Honghui

Abstract

Superstitions are unproven beliefs that shape decision-making. While many studies have examined their influence on corporate financial decisions, few have addressed their impact on corporate social responsibility (CSR). In this study, we focus on the superstition associated with the Chinese zodiac year – a belief linked to bad luck – and investigate its effect on firms’ charitable donations. Drawing on literature concerning stress appraisal, resource building, and corporate philanthropy, and using data from Chinese listed firms from 2008 to 2020, we find a positive association between a CEO’s zodiac year and corporate donations. Furthermore, this effect is weakened by CEO’s overconfidence and amplified by increased negative media coverage of CEOs during zodiac years. This study contributes to the literature on the outcomes of superstitions in management, the antecedents of corporate philanthropy, the boundary conditions of stress appraisal, and the agency motivations of corporate philanthropy. Managerial implications are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Lin & Zhang, Guo & Zeng, Chenlv & Chen, Honghui, 2025. "Superstition and Corporate Philanthropy: Evidence from Chinese Zodiac Year Belief," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(5), pages 915-942, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:915-942_6
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877625100855/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:5:p:915-942_6. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.