IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v21y2025i4p794-822_9.html

Revisiting the Paradoxes of Knowledge Diversity and Network Structure for Team Innovation: A Machine-Learning Inductive Study

Author

Listed:
  • Gao, Xin
  • Luo, Jar-der
  • Wang, Song
  • Li, Peter Ping

Abstract

Team innovation is nurtured by the combination of team members’ diverse knowledge and collaborative teamwork. Previous research predominantly assumed a linear interaction between knowledge diversity and network density in predicting team innovation. A pivotal question arises: How do varying levels of knowledge diversity and network density interact to influence team innovation? To address this complex question, we conducted a machine-learning inductive study, leveraging its ability to uncover curvilinear interactive patterns between knowledge diversity and network density in fostering team innovation. We collected comprehensive, multisource data from 1,883 teams within a prominent high-technology firm in China over a four-year period from 2014 to 2017. The results indicate that knowledge diversity and network density exhibit a curvilinear interactive effect on team innovation. The two factors reinforce each other in the initial stage and foster peak innovation with an optimal balance at a medium-to-high level. Beyond this threshold, however, the two factors begin to restrain each other’s effectiveness. Consistent with the perspective of yin-yang balancing, this study deepens our understanding of the paradoxical joint effects of knowledge diversity and network density on team innovation.

Suggested Citation

  • Gao, Xin & Luo, Jar-der & Wang, Song & Li, Peter Ping, 2025. "Revisiting the Paradoxes of Knowledge Diversity and Network Structure for Team Innovation: A Machine-Learning Inductive Study," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(4), pages 794-822, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:794-822_9
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877625101010/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:4:p:794-822_9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.