IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v21y2025i2p394-407_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Paradox of Family Firms: Comment on Fang, Singh, Kim, Marler, and Chrisman (2022)

Author

Listed:
  • Skorodziyevskiy, Vitaliy

Abstract

The flourishing nature of family business research is evident not only in the growth of the number of studies published in top-tier journals over the past several decades (Daspit, Madison, Nordqvist, & Sieger, 2024; Rovelli, Ferasso, De Massis, & Kraus, 2022) but also in the number of studies that explore family business research outside Western contexts (e.g., primarily the US). An excellent example of such pioneering research is the literature review by Fang, Singh, Kim, Marler, and Chrisman (2022), published in the Asia Pacific Journal of Management. Their paper not only accumulates knowledge about Asian and particularly Chinese family firms (over 30% of articles in Fang et al. (2022) are on Chinese family firms) but also compares the findings to those in Western contexts, inspiring further exploration and theorization.

Suggested Citation

  • Skorodziyevskiy, Vitaliy, 2025. "Paradox of Family Firms: Comment on Fang, Singh, Kim, Marler, and Chrisman (2022)," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(2), pages 394-407, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:394-407_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877624000731/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:21:y:2025:i:2:p:394-407_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.