IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v20y2024i6p875-904_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Chinese Context and Theoretical Contributions to Management and Organization Research: A Replication and Extension

Author

Listed:
  • You, Shuyang
  • Jia, Liangding
  • Wang, Yang
  • Liu, Chenxin
  • Yin, Nianwei

Abstract

We replicate and extend Jia, You, and Du's (2012) study. We added samples from the last 13 years (from 2011 to 2023) and analyzed these new samples using the same methodology as the 2012 article. Our replication found that in the last 13 years, 4 articles in the six leading journals and 16 articles in Management and Organization Review (MOR) have the highest degree of Chinese contextualization in concepts (what), their relationships (how), and the logics underlying the relationships (why). The Chinese context continues to contribute novel knowledge. The extension study fully demonstrates that in the 20 years since its birth, MOR has been on the path of pursuing its original aspiration and realizing its mission. On the what, why, and joint contextualization dimensions, the proportion of articles published in MOR with high contextualized theoretical contributions is higher than the proportion in the six leading journals. On the theory-building dimension, the overall degree of the articles published in MOR is higher than that of those published in the six leading journals. This indicates that MOR publishes articles that are not only of high quality and make general theoretical contributions, but also are highly relevant to the Chinese context.

Suggested Citation

  • You, Shuyang & Jia, Liangding & Wang, Yang & Liu, Chenxin & Yin, Nianwei, 2024. "Chinese Context and Theoretical Contributions to Management and Organization Research: A Replication and Extension," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(6), pages 875-904, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:875-904_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174087762400069X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:6:p:875-904_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.