IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v20y2024i5p748-772_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

‘Digital Divide’: How Do Central and Local SOEs Respond Differently to Digitalization in China

Author

Listed:
  • Luo, Xiaowei Rose
  • Wang, Jun
  • Chen, Shuangying
  • Chen, Boyi

Abstract

Despite the important role of state-owned enterprises (SOEs) in government policy implementation, there is a lack of research on how SOEs owned by different government entities differ. We draw on an attention-based view (ABV) to understand how central government-owned (called central SOEs) and local government-owned enterprises (called local SOEs) differ in their response to digitalization, a major state objective in China in recent years. The two types of SOEs differ in the foundational feature of attention structure – the rules of the game (as embodied in their different goals, identities, and evaluation of top executives) – as well as important features such as governance structures and resources. These features can trigger more attention in central SOEs to digitalization. Given the interdependence of these features in shaping the structural distribution of attention, we further propose how governance structures and resources can influence strategic attention differently in SOEs with different rules of the game. The arguments are tested using data from all Chinese-listed manufacturing SOEs between 2009 and 2020. The study reveals different responses to national strategy between central and local SOEs due to their distinct attention structures designed by the state. It also extends the ABV and research on corporate digital transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Luo, Xiaowei Rose & Wang, Jun & Chen, Shuangying & Chen, Boyi, 2024. "‘Digital Divide’: How Do Central and Local SOEs Respond Differently to Digitalization in China," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(5), pages 748-772, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:5:p:748-772_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877624000299/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:5:p:748-772_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.