IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v20y2024i4p566-585_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Zhiqiang
  • Xu, Yuping
  • Yu, Ziyi
  • Wu, Bingqing
  • Wang, Zijing

Abstract

Although some organizations encourage employees to generate radical ideas by implementing stretch goals, the relationship between stretch goals and radical creativity is complicated. Unfortunately, existing research has not adequately addressed this issue. Therefore, we integrate signaling theory with creativity-related research and propose that the interaction between stretch goals and cognitive flexibility predicts employees' willingness to take risks, thereby influencing their engagement in radical creative activities and ultimately affecting their radical creativity. To test our hypotheses, we conduct two empirical studies. The results suggest that, for employees with high cognitive flexibility, stretch goals increase their willingness to assume risks, thus leading to improved engagement in radical creative activities and enhancing their radical creativity. Conversely, for employees with low cognitive flexibility, stretch goals decrease their willingness to take risks, which hampers their engagement in radical creative activities and their radical creativity. The theoretical contributions and practical implications of this study are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Zhiqiang & Xu, Yuping & Yu, Ziyi & Wu, Bingqing & Wang, Zijing, 2024. "Stretch Goals and Radical Creativity: Cognitive Flexibility as a Key Contingency," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 566-585, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:566-585_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S174087762400007X/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:566-585_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.