IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/maorev/v20y2024i4p541-565_2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Becoming Better: When and Why Positive Status Change Induces Prosocial Behavior Versus Self-Interested Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Zhe
  • Yueqiao, Qiao
  • Jia, Ming
  • Ju, Boyuan
  • Wang, Xingquan

Abstract

Prior research on status has focused primarily on the cognitive perspective, exploring the effects of status and offering a limited understanding of the impact of positive status change and its emotional mechanisms. This study draws upon the two-facet model of pride to examine how positive status change influences the behaviors of new status holders. Specifically, we propose that when status differentiation is low, positive status change enhances new status holders' prosocial behavior through their authentic pride, while in cases of high status differentiation, it increases their self-interested behavior through their hubristic pride. To test our hypotheses, we conducted a series of studies, including a laboratory experiment, a scenario experiment, and a time-lagged multilevel and multisource field study. Our multilevel analyses of the data provided strong support for our hypotheses. Our findings shed light on when and why positive status change triggers different behaviors among new status holders, offering important insights into the emotional mechanisms that underlie the effects of status change.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Zhe & Yueqiao, Qiao & Jia, Ming & Ju, Boyuan & Wang, Xingquan, 2024. "Becoming Better: When and Why Positive Status Change Induces Prosocial Behavior Versus Self-Interested Behavior," Management and Organization Review, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20(4), pages 541-565, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:541-565_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1740877624000457/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:maorev:v:20:y:2024:i:4:p:541-565_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mor .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.