IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/macdyn/v12y2008is1p31-44_07.html

The Fiscal Theory Of The Price Level Puzzle: A Non-Ricardian View

Author

Listed:
  • BÉNASSY, JEAN-PASCAL

Abstract

The fiscal theory of the price level says that the price level can be made determinate if the government uses fiscal policies such that government liabilities explode unless the price in the first period is at the “right” level. The policy implications are disturbing, as they call for rather adventurous fiscal policies. We show that these disturbing policy implications are specific to the “Ricardian” models that have been used to develop the theory. By moving to non-Ricardian models, we see that price determinacy is consistent with reasonable fiscal policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Bénassy, Jean-Pascal, 2008. "The Fiscal Theory Of The Price Level Puzzle: A Non-Ricardian View," Macroeconomic Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(S1), pages 31-44, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:12:y:2008:i:s1:p:31-44_07
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1365100507070071/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Plantin, Guillaume & Barthélemy, Jean & Mengus, Eric, 2019. "Public Liquidity Demand and Central Bank Independence," CEPR Discussion Papers 14160, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    2. Fan, Jingwen & Minford, Patrick, 2009. "Can the Fiscal Theory of the price level explain UK inflation in the 1970s?," Cardiff Economics Working Papers E2009/26, Cardiff University, Cardiff Business School, Economics Section, revised Mar 2011.
    3. Jean‐Pascal Bénassy, 2009. "Interest rate rules and global determinacy: An alternative to the Taylor principle," International Journal of Economic Theory, The International Society for Economic Theory, vol. 5(4), pages 359-374, December.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:macdyn:v:12:y:2008:i:s1:p:31-44_07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/mdy .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.