IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jwecon/v21y2026i3p_2.html

Patterns and clusters of pesticide reduction strategies in Swiss viticulture

Author

Listed:
  • Ziehmann, Eileen
  • Zachmann, Lucca
  • Finger, Robert

Abstract

Viticulture is essential for reducing pesticide use and associated risks. Often the adoption of individual pesticide reduction measures is investigated in isolation, and little is known on broader patterns and the joint adoption of measures. We address this gap by analyzing adoption choices of Swiss grape growers across a large number of pesticide reduction measures, using a contingency analysis and a k-means clustering algorithm. We focus on how measure, farm, and farmer characteristics correlate with this adoption. The analysis uses survey data collected among 436 Swiss grapevine producers. Results indicate that farmers in our sample appear to exploit complementary effects between measures. Moreover, the cluster analysis reveals that Swiss producers can be split into two groups of roughly equal size, with one adopting a greater variety of pesticide reduction measures, and the other relying more on pesticides alone. We further identify significant differences in farm and farmer characteristics that could explain this variation in measure adoption. Our analysis has important implications for research and policy. Firstly, they underline the importance of fostering the adoption of efficient and effective measure bundles. Secondly, they highlight the need for targeted policies to mobilize farmers relying mostly on pesticides to diversify their plant protection practices and thus contribute to overall pesticide reduction.

Suggested Citation

  • Ziehmann, Eileen & Zachmann, Lucca & Finger, Robert, 2026. "Patterns and clusters of pesticide reduction strategies in Swiss viticulture," Journal of Wine Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 21(3), pages -2, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:21:y:2026:i:3:p:_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1931436126101187/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jwecon:v:21:y:2026:i:3:p:_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jwe .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.