IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v4y2009i4p280-286_3.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving

Author

Listed:
  • Ersner-Hershfield, Hal
  • Garton, M. Tess
  • Ballard, Kacey
  • Samanez-Larkin, Gregory R.
  • Knutson, Brian

Abstract

Some people find it more difficult to delay rewards than others. In three experiments, we tested a “future self-continuity” hypothesis that individual differences in the perception of one’s present self as continuous with a future self would be associated with measures of saving in the laboratory and everyday life. Higher future self-continuity (assessed by a novel index) predicted reduced discounting of future rewards in a laboratory task, more matches in adjectival descriptions of present and future selves, and greater lifetime accumulation of financial assets (even after controlling for age and education). In addition to demonstrating the reliability and validity of the future self-continuity index, these findings are consistent with the notion that increased future self-continuity might promote saving for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Ersner-Hershfield, Hal & Garton, M. Tess & Ballard, Kacey & Samanez-Larkin, Gregory R. & Knutson, Brian, 2009. "Don’t stop thinking about tomorrow: Individual differences in future self-continuity account for saving," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 4(4), pages 280-286, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:280-286_3
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500003855/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:4:y:2009:i:4:p:280-286_3. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.