IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v20y2025ip-_26.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The martingale index: A measure of self-deception in betting and finance

Author

Listed:
  • Dimitrov, Valentin
  • Shafer, Glenn

Abstract

People who repeatedly risk money, whether they be traders for financial institutions, corporate executives, day traders, or sports bettors, sometimes appear to do better than chance only because the risk of large losses is hidden or overlooked. As students of casino gambling know, one way to obscure the risk of large losses is to bet more when you are losing and less when you are winning. In 19th century casinos, betting strategies that did this were called martingales. Following such strategies, whether deliberately or unwittingly, was called martingaling. Traders in financial instruments often martingale; in fact, they are martingaling whenever they respond to a margin call. A businessperson who doubles down on an apparently losing investment is martingaling. Opinionated sports bettors easily fall into martingaling. The martingale index, defined in this paper, measures the portion of the apparent success of a betting, trading, or investment strategy that can be attributed to martingaling. We calculate the martingale index for some popular casino strategies and also for some strategies that model random trading in S&P 500 futures and in stocks. And we discuss how educating the public about the martingale index might help both businesses and individuals avoid the temptations of martingaling.

Suggested Citation

  • Dimitrov, Valentin & Shafer, Glenn, 2025. "The martingale index: A measure of self-deception in betting and finance," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 20, pages 1-1, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:20:y:2025:i::p:-_26
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297525000129/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:20:y:2025:i::p:-_26. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.