IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v16y2021i3p687-708_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Misjudgment of interrupted time-series graphs due to serial dependence: Replication of Matyas and Greenwood (1990)

Author

Listed:
  • Bishara, Anthony J.
  • Peller, Jacob
  • Galuska, Chad M.

Abstract

Interrupted time-series graphs are often judged by eye. Such a graph might show, for example, patient symptom severity (y) on each of several days (x) before and after a treatment was implemented (interruption). Such graphs might be prone to systematic misjudgment because of serial dependence, where random error at each timepoint persists into later timepoints. An earlier study (Matyas & Greenwood, 1990) showed evidence of systematic misjudgment, but that study has often been discounted due to methodological concerns. We address these concerns and others in two experiments. In both experiments, serial dependence increased mistaken judgments that the interrupting event led to a change in the outcome, though the pattern of results was less extreme than in previous work. Receiver operating characteristics suggested that serial dependence both decreased discriminability and increased the bias to decide that the interrupting event led to a change. This serial dependence effect appeared despite financial incentives for accuracy, despite feedback training, and even in participants who had graduate training relevant to the task. Serial dependence could cause random error to be misattributed to real change, thereby leading to judgments that interventions are effective even when they are not.

Suggested Citation

  • Bishara, Anthony J. & Peller, Jacob & Galuska, Chad M., 2021. "Misjudgment of interrupted time-series graphs due to serial dependence: Replication of Matyas and Greenwood (1990)," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 687-708, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:687-708_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500007786/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:16:y:2021:i:3:p:687-708_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.