IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/judgdm/v14y2019i1p98-108_10.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in soccer penalty shootouts

Author

Listed:
  • Avugos, Simcha
  • Azar, Ofer H.
  • Gavish, Nadav
  • Sher, Eran
  • Bar-Eli, Michael

Abstract

Previous research has reported that the gambler’s fallacy could be detected in goalkeepers’ behavior during penalty shootouts. Following repeated kicks in the same direction, goalkeepers were more likely to dive in the opposite direction on the next kick. We employ here a unique data collection approach and accurately measure the exact location of each ball when crossing the goal plane. This allows us to analyze how different definitions of the goal center width affect the results, and we show that this width indeed affects whether a gambler’s fallacy in goalkeepers’ diving behavior exists. We further augment the data with additional kicks from top international competitions and analyze the extended dataset. We also question whether previous treatments of kicking sequences adequately represent what goalkeepers consider as a run of consecutive kicks to the same side. A different representation of kicking sequences is provided and applied to the data. Overall, we find some evidence for the gambler’s fallacy after sequences of two or three kicks to the same side.

Suggested Citation

  • Avugos, Simcha & Azar, Ofer H. & Gavish, Nadav & Sher, Eran & Bar-Eli, Michael, 2019. "Goal center width, how to count sequences, and the gambler’s fallacy in soccer penalty shootouts," Judgment and Decision Making, Cambridge University Press, vol. 14(1), pages 98-108, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:98-108_10
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1930297500002953/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:judgdm:v:14:y:2019:i:1:p:98-108_10. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jdm .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.