IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i3p957-980_15.html

From promise to betrayal: A systematic review of the link between psychological contract and employee well-being

Author

Listed:
  • Mahalekamge, Geethani
  • Gardiner, Elliroma
  • Ali, Muhammad

Abstract

This systematic review examines the relationship between psychological contract breach (PCB)/fulfilment (PCF) and employee well-being, with a specific focus on mediating and moderating mechanisms. A systematic search in four databases yielded 59 empirical studies published between 1990 and 2024. The findings indicate that PCB hinders employee well-being, whereas PCF supports a range of well-being outcomes, and there is no consensus on whether PCB or PCF has a greater impact on employee well-being. Evidence also suggests that PCB and PCF are related but distinct constructs. Synthesising mediators and moderators, the review advances a contingent and process-based understanding of how psychological contract evaluations shape employee well-being. The evidence further indicates that the relative impact of PCB or PCF on employee well-being is conditional rather than universal. These findings extend conservation of resources and social exchange theories, and highlight the need for more theoretically rigorous and causally robust future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Mahalekamge, Geethani & Gardiner, Elliroma & Ali, Muhammad, 2026. "From promise to betrayal: A systematic review of the link between psychological contract and employee well-being," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 957-980, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:957-980_15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367226100935/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:957-980_15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.