IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i3p869-891_11.html

How citizenship fatigue mediates person-organization fit and employee outcomes

Author

Listed:
  • Zugay, Benjamin
  • Simha, Aditya
  • Zakaria, Rimi
  • Azhar, Saleem

Abstract

This study identifies P–O (person–organization) fit as a key construct affecting employee citizenship fatigue, affective commitment, and turnover intention. We use the conservation of resources theory to explain how citizenship fatigue, the unintended by-product of organizational citizenship behavior, mediates the relationship between P–O fit and key employee outcomes. The conceptual model was tested on a sample of 206 employees from the United States, obtained through a two-phase survey. The empirical results strongly suggest that citizenship fatigue mediates the relationship between P–O fit, turnover intention, and affective commitment. While P–O fit’s positive effects are well documented in organizational behavior research, this study highlights the dark side of citizenship behaviors in predicting costly individual-level and organizational consequences. We conclude by discussing some practical and theoretical implications of our research findings, while considering the relevance of stress and fatigue given the increasingly fast-paced and pluralistic work environment.

Suggested Citation

  • Zugay, Benjamin & Simha, Aditya & Zakaria, Rimi & Azhar, Saleem, 2026. "How citizenship fatigue mediates person-organization fit and employee outcomes," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 869-891, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:869-891_11
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100370/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:869-891_11. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.