IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cup/jomorg/v32y2026i3p682-700_2.html

Remote work intensity and individual work performance: indirect effects through leadership behaviors and employee work motivation

Author

Listed:
  • Stenling, Andreas
  • Tafvelin, Susanne
  • Bentzen, Marte
  • Olafsen, Anja H.

Abstract

The rise of remote work has reshaped organizational dynamics, necessitating a deeper understanding of its implications for leadership, employee motivation, and performance. This longitudinal study examined direct and indirect effects (via leadership behaviors) of remote work intensity on employee motivation and performance. Using three waves of survey data from 512 Norwegian employees, results indicate that higher remote work intensity positively predicted perceived need-supportive leadership and negatively predicted perceived controlling and laissez-faire leadership. Need-supportive leadership positively predicted intrinsic motivation, which in turn predicted adaptability and proactivity, whereas controlling leadership positively predicted extrinsic regulation and amotivation. Amotivation negatively predicted proficiency but was a positive predictor of proactivity. Laissez-faire leadership also positively predicted proactivity, suggesting that reduced managerial oversight may encourage initiative in certain remote work contexts. These results offer valuable insights for organizations navigating the future of work, highlighting the need for leadership strategies that enhance intrinsic motivation and adaptability in remote work settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Stenling, Andreas & Tafvelin, Susanne & Bentzen, Marte & Olafsen, Anja H., 2026. "Remote work intensity and individual work performance: indirect effects through leadership behaviors and employee work motivation," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 32(3), pages 682-700, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:682-700_2
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1833367225100564/type/journal_article
    File Function: link to article abstract page
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cup:jomorg:v:32:y:2026:i:3:p:682-700_2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Kirk Stebbing (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cambridge.org/jmo .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.